As energy brokers, our role is to help educate, and below are a few facts on why more than 50% of electricity in the U.S. will be generated by renewable energy by 2030.
Older forms of energy production rely on finite resources
In the U.S., many of the older forms of energy production were adequate to their time, but did not fully take the future into account. They were based on then-abundant resources which were cheap to harvest and convert into energy. These resources were also relatively nearby and, at least at the beginning of energy conversion history, were not known to cause the devastating, environmentally harmful impacts. Over time the energy industry, like many Americans, began to realize the economic and environmental benefits of renewable energy.
Why do renewable energy sources make sense for energy companies and consumers?
Although some criticize renewable energy sources as costly to create, they are undoubtedly a long-lasting resource that benefits both energy companies and consumers. There is no theoretical limit to the amount of sunshine, wind, water, and other renewable energy sources that can be harvested and used again and again. For example, the same stream can help produce power for generations instead of “running out” or depleting the amount of water in it. Additionally, there are often various federal, state, and local tax incentives that help defray the cost of using renewable energy sources, which not only help energy companies afford renewable energy sources, but also help them keep prices low for consumers. This contributes to the ability of renewable energy sources to be invested in and proliferate for years to come.
What reason is there to think we’ll reach such a high number of renewable energy sources by 2030?
In an optimistic prediction, NextEra Energy has put down a marker regarding high renewable energy growth in the next decade. Even without delving into the numbers, it makes sense that renewable energy is the wave of the future. Unlike some older forms of energy production, they don’t suffer from worry about a date they will run out. Additionally, governments and populations are much more likely to support the building of a clean energy plant due to its environmentally-friendly nature and lack of output such as smoke, smog, or a derisive smell, which can send property values plummeting and some neighbors’ health issues into a tail spin. No matter what the exact number or percentage of renewable energy sources ends up being in 2030, you can be sure that renewable energy will only be growing over time.
COVID-19 has changed the way we look at many facets of life. From how and where we work to where we go and, in some cases, even what we eat. To say that this seismic shift is anything less than revolutionary would be a gross understatement. For many, this also raises questions regarding how and in what way we will begin to plot and choose our energy future. Will we go back to the ways of the past, with heavy reliance on fossil fuels and other non-renewable sources, or will we plot a new course with renewable source that are good for our environment and our pocketbooks?
COVID-19 and the Energy Environment
COVID-19 brought much of our world’s economic activity to an abrupt halt save for certain essential activities such as medical care, grocery stocking, food delivery, and other services that were crucial to the basic functioning of society. As people stayed home and traveled less, there was a noticeable impact on the ecology and the environment of local areas and globally. Everything from CO2 emissions from air travel and vehicles, both commercial and private, to other sources of emissions and pollution were curtailed dramatically. This began to lead to the clearing of air, water, and other parts of the environment which had previously been adversely impacted by human and industrial activity. Some environmentalists and others celebrated this turn of events.
What Does Less Personal Contact Mean for Clean Energy?
For generations, labor intensive energy sources have been prevalent and cheap ways to provide cars the fuel they need, homes and office buildings the heat and air conditioning they need, and power to an array of other projects that drive our society and consume energy. However, COVID-19 made gathering in one place without proper ventilation and less than six feet apart not only less than hygienic, but potentially life-threatening for those who do. Given the fact that the contagion can not only impact those who are initially exposed but can spread exponentially, these tight conditions are nothing but a breeding ground for potential death or serious injuries, with life-long consequences – which most energy workers do not have the health insurance or personal funds to cover. Personal contact has proven to be arguably more dangerous than the environmental impacts of the energy sources themselves.
Where Does Clean Energy Come In?
Clean energy sources are often not as labor-intensive as other energy source. They don’t require a packed mineshaft with little ventilation, an offshore oil rig, or other close personal contact to the extent or level that other energy sources do. This is a net advantage as the energy sources are not only environmentally friendly, but also qualify for various tax credits at the federal and state level, which can help offset the initial set-up cost or any personnel costs. Additionally, clean energy may now be seen as an appreciating instead of depreciating asset, as there is a finite amount of oil, coal, and other resources but there is an arguably infinite amount of air, water, and sunshine.
Does This Mean Clean Energy Will Be the Norm?
A completely clean energy future is still a long while away. However, given the definite downsides of some legacy energy production processes, some energy producers will be taking a closer look at clean energy now and in the future. Any savvy energy broker should keep an eye out for how this will impact the industry and how this can potentially save clients money.
During trying times, many businesses – including energy brokers – work to retain customers with incentives while trying to recruit new customers. This is done to help combat the drop-off which happens with a variety of situations, but especially with an economic downturn. One of the more important functions that an energy broker can do to retain a level of client loyalty and trust, is to constantly communicate that you’re working for your clients on a daily basis – whether they realize it or not.
Updating your clients via mail and e-mail
Now that in-person meetings are either still prohibited, or, even in states with looser orders, highly discouraged, energy brokers have to find socially distant ways to stay in touch with their clients. One free, convenient way is a weekly newsletter detailing your activities. This can touch on what you’re doing, developments in the energy market, and how working with you continues to save them money in a volatile market. You can even run raffles or invite clients to be featured in your next newsletter along with testimonials. For older clients or, for a more personal touch, you can hand-write notes thanking clients for their continued business and insert energy market updates for them. These personal updates and touches can go a long way to keeping your clients’ loyalty and business for years to come.
Create a presence on social media
If you’re not already on social media, now is a great time to get on a variety of social media platforms so you can communicate with clients and potential clients on what you do as an energy broker and how you’re working for them. Many professionals focus on Twitter and LinkedIn with some forays into Facebook and Instagram to keep clients updated and track what’s going on in the energy market. You can also incorporate some personal yet professional photos and anecdotes so clients get to see another side of their energy broker. Given the right tone, style and attention, this could increase your business substantially and propel you into the “thought leadership” arena where you are looked to as an expert in the field on social media. This could even lead to media mentions of you and your business. For a good example of how to balance a personal and professional Twitter voice on the same account, look to Disney CEO Bob Iger who maintains a personal voice while advancing professional priorities.
Use substantive communications to get your value across
While clients appreciate the occasional check in regarding how you personally are doing, they are more interested in the value you are providing them and how you’re saving them money in the short and long term. Comparing the performance of your work compared to them not using an energy broker is a great way for them to know that you’re saving them money they hadn’t even considered. Invest in and learn a good graphics program and how to make charts and comparison tables. Pictures are often much more effective than a long soliloquy that comprises of multiple paragraphs. Additionally, using words that reinforce your value such as savings through experience or through exclusive relationships will ensure clients understand why you are the top pick for their energy needs.
Tailor your communications to your clients’ concerns
No matter when you send a communication to your clients, make sure it is appropriate for the moment and for their concerns. During an economic downturn, lean into how you save them money. During a good economy, lean into efficiencies and how they might be able to upgrade some energy appliances in their home to be more energy efficient, which is good for the environment and the pocketbook. It’s always a good time to let your clients know what you do for them as long as the communication is appropriate to the moment and is likely to reflect favorably on you.
Like many industries, energy brokers are working with a new reality when it comes to business during the time of coronavirus. COVID-19 has diverted many people’s attention away from the task at hand and has instead focused them on their own lives, health, and imperatives. Today’s economy is a new place for many people who just months ago believed in a totally different economic reality. While this has placed a burden on thousands of businesses and individuals, this creates an opportunity for energy brokers to innovate insofar as how they present themselves to potential clients and make sure to re-emphasize the value they offer. After the pandemic, following these tips will help ensure that you and your business stand out from the pack when the energy market is on the road to recovery.
Customer service is paramount. No matter the economic timing, good customer service is never out of style. In fact, during a recovery, the business that makes life easiest for their customers will more likely than not see their customers’ loyalty to the broker who ensures the best deal with the smallest wait time on prices. Knowing and anticipating your customer’s needs not only helps you stand out from the pack but it helps you keep up a steady cadence of contact so your customer knows you as the go-to energy broker and refers their friends and business colleagues to you.
Be Transparent About Savings and What Your Business Does. So many wonder what an energy broker is and how you can save them money. You should be transparent about how you can save consumers money and what your business does to ensure they get the best price and treatment possible when it comes to making their energy decisions. While you are an expert at the energy broker business, you should be prepared to ensue you have the answers for the questions they will ask. No matter the consumer, keeping their interests top of mind will help ensure that you’re seen as a reliable and trustworthy partner.
Be Sensitive to Business’ Immediate and Long-Term Needs. Following the pandemic, individuals and businesses will be in various states of needed and receptivity to energy broker services. While the first impulse would be a hard sell of saving money immediately, only some may be receptive to that as they may be unwilling to change from a provider who they may have an outstanding debt with during the pandemic or who they felt was there for them during a time of economic and health uncertainty. Although everyone is a potential client, there is a time and place to pitch them. Ensure that your pitch and information is calibrated to their economic situation and state of mind. Sometimes, just opening the door to working together in the future is a win.
Ensure That You’re Apprised of All Industry, Regulatory, and Legal Developments. Above all, clients will be looking to you as the expert on how exactly using your services can benefit not only their bottom line when it comes to energy bills but how they can leverage your services to benefit them in other parts of their business such as through government or other tax rebates or incentives. Being the master of each piece of information in your world and how it can benefit your clients in a multitude of ways will distinguish your services from the rest.
No one can predict when or how the pandemic will end but energy brokers and be prepared for the next steps both clients and the economy overall take so when we’re back on the road to recovery, you can be at the front of the pack.
It’s no surprise to anyone that COVID-19, also known as coronavirus, has roiled the energy markets and the economy worldwide. With general economic activity and consumption going down, there have been many who pessimistically view the energy market as another victim of this global downturn and urge consumers, business leaders, and others to hoard cash and not take any steps until there is absolutely 100% certainty about the future. While this advice may hold true for some markets, it certainly does not hold true for energy markets. Below, you’ll see why now is an ideal time to help secure cost savings in the face of declining revenue for some and new opportunities for others.
What is COVID-19 and how has it impacted the global economy?
COVID-19 is a viral disease which is transmitted through person to person contact which causes severe symptoms in those it impacts, in particular the elderly and those with underlying health conditions. Most anyone can be impacted and be a carrier, even if there are only mild symptoms, a person who carries the disease may have a disproportionate impact on the health of others. Given the amount of commerce that is conducted in person from meetings to individuals patronizing restaurants, gyms, spas, and other establishments to the drop in travel, COVID-19 has hit almost every sector of the economy. This has had the ripple effect of causing layoffs, making businesses and consumers slash their spending, and resulting in a general downturn of economic activity no matter the kind of business to the point that governments around the world have had to bailout or provide certain monetary support to individual businesses or sectors of the economy.
What does COVID-19 and the economic downturn mean for the energy sector in particular?
During this time of economic uncertainty, demand has dropped for a wide variety of services. For better or worse, this includes the price of energy that both businesses and consumers will pay. Energy prices are now at their lowest level in more than 15 years due to the lack of demand from those who use energy on a daily and reliable basis. Additionally, the increase in production from key energy suppliers overseas has led to a large surplus related to normal demand and an even larger surplus of oil related to the current global demand. As energy is produced from a variety of sources, including oil, when there is a glut of supply in the market then overall energy prices go down.
What does this mean for those who are watching energy prices?
For those who are watching energy prices and the energy market, the low prices continue to be a boon for consumers who may be suffering operational losses elsewhere or may need to save money. Locking in a lower rate today is the first step to helping those who need to cut costs identify a center of cost savings. With the uncertain economic climate, any place that can help lower total expenditures should be under serious consideration.
Climate change and global warming have gone from a niche political issue 20 or more years ago to front and center topics, which impact a wide variety of industries and much of our public discourse. From the Green New Deal to other plans to combat the spread of climate change and other ecological impacts, a wide variety of solutions have been proposed to help reduce the economic impact of any plan that might constrain industry in addition to promoting Earth’s long-term well-being. For many, one of the more business or market-friendly solutions is a carbon pricing plan. Below, we’ll explore what it is, how it works, and what it means for industry going forward in uncertain economic times.
What is Carbon Pricing?
Carbon pricing is when carbon emissions themselves are calculated and a cost is associated with the emission. For example, carbon emissions are created when coal, natural gas, and oil are used to create energy. These energy sources, known as fossil fuels, create the carbon emissions which are primarily responsible, if not heavily contribute, to climate change. Proponents of carbon pricing argue that climate change, including rising sea levels and temperatures, is mainly caused by industries and activities which disproportionately produce these outputs, and, therefore these effects.
By working to assign a price to these carbon outputs, businesses will become more conscious of creating these outputs and will, in turn, find a way to create less of them. This burden shifting from those who have to deal with the impact of climate change and find a solution, namely government and taxpayers, to those who create the carbon outputs, energy producers and other industries, is just one goal of carbon pricing. The other goal is to help ensure that more climate-friendly technology will be introduced and used in the fight against climate change by businesses as they look to reduce their overall carbon usage.
How Do Carbon Pricing Plans Work?
The principal method for executing a carbon evaluating plan is through a plan which has accepted its reasonable part of information inclusion and is ordinarily known as cap-and-trade. This system would force a cap on how much carbon outflows that could be utilized in a year and utilize a market-based system so makers, energy makers, or others could acquire more. For instance, assuming that 100 carbon units are split between qualifying organizations in entire or to a limited extent, a few organizations can pay others or go to an open market to offer on carbon units which assist with guaranteeing they make their energy or creation standard. This boosts numerous organizations to 1) put resources into more effective methods for creating their item or energy and 2) put resources into all the more harmless to the ecosystem ways for these activities to occur. This likewise helps reward energy-productive organizations by permitting them to offer their portion of the carbon unit to recover the expense of introducing and putting resources into harmless to the ecosystem innovation and in the end benefitting from such a choice in the short or long haul.
The second method for executing a carbon evaluating plan is through a carbon tax. A significantly more direct method for executing a carbon valuing plan, the carbon tax would punish the individuals who use carbon more by taxing them more. The motivator for any carbon maker would in this manner be bringing down their tax trouble by putting resources into energy-proficient and harmless to the ecosystem innovation. Some have likewise proposed a rising carbon tax over the long haul so even the biggest firms are not resistant from the immediate expense of delivering carbon without finding a way ways to further develop their energy productivity. At last, there are a few half breed models that consider the two plans which have been proposed and perhaps serviceable.
What’s the significance here for energy makers and other carbon-weighty ventures?
Numerous people and business pioneers have been watching the advancement of the carbon valuing plan and the various proposition encompassing it with interest for how might affect both the economy and the climate. While there are numerous propositions being talked about at different degrees of government, Congress still can’t seem to pass a bill that would order an authoritative carbon evaluating plan plot. Until further notice, the public discussion will go on with regards to the most ideal way to carry out a carbon estimating plan, on the off chance that one is carried out by any stretch of the imagination.
It’s no secret that the climate is changing. In various parts of the world, we’re now seeing new types of weather; whether its higher temperatures, less frequent occurrences of winter weather, and dynamic shifts that foreshadow a worsening of global temperatures. For so many, questions abound on how this will impact our personal lives, businesses at large, and other crucial components of society and our economy. However, one of the lesser questioned parts of climate change and extreme weather is its impact on energy consumption.
Does climate change have an impact on extreme weather and energy consumption?
Many times, there is an open question as to whether climate change has an impact on creating extreme weather which, in turn, creates a higher demand for energy consumption. Changing needs have created changing consumer habits. Extreme weather events for some areas may not even be something as dramatic as a hurricane, earthquake, or tornado. They can be as predictable as a heat wave or cold snap meaning more energy will be required for a longer amount of time.
What are some examples of the impact extreme weather can have on energy consumption?
According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), there are very real costs to extreme weather events such as a warmer climate. The agency cites data which indicates that a 6 to 9 degree rise in summer temperatures could increase the need for energy output and production by 10 – 20% by 2050. For some, this may not sound like much but it represents hundreds of billions of dollars in investment in infrastructure and output mechanisms. Additionally, some of our existing structures may be rendered less efficient due to the need for cooling water to efficiently run most of these power plants. With warmer water, plants will have to work harder to produce the same amount of power at less efficiency.
What other indirect impact could occur as a result of energy consumption?
One of the unheralded issues that could arise is the competition for natural resources that occurs when there are impacts as a result of relatively extreme weather. For example, power plants sometimes require large amounts of water to ensure they operate within safe, not even efficient, parameters. As water is a necessary and desired resource, power companies will be in competition with local governments and reservoirs to be the first to use the diminishing supply of water available to keep pace with traditional demand. Additionally, given the rising temperatures, power companies will not only have to keep pace with traditional demand, they will have to somehow compensate for increased demand to cope with the rising heat.
Are there any other vulnerabilities that could impact energy consumption or availability?
Given the amount and severity of hurricanes, it is entirely possible that oil-producing platforms which may have been previously considered safe will now be in the path of terrible storms. Hurricanes Katrina and Rita damaged hundreds of platforms which had negative impacts on oil distribution and availability, for example, hurting not just local energy concerns but impacting global supply as well. For many, it may well be time to take some stock on distribution channels and construction suitability for extreme weather events.
Will an extreme weather event impact energy consumption soon?
Although there is no way to know when or how an extreme weather event can or will impact energy consumption, it is likely that we will again see energy consumption impacted by extreme weather in the years to come.
One of the heavily watched industries in our nation’s capital is the energy industry and, crucially, one of the most talked about laws subject to change is the National Environmental Policy Act, which governs a multitude of industries which interact with the environment.
What is the National Environmental Policy Act?
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) was established in part to help ensure that environmental impacts were studied and considered before any project could take place. This extends to energy, infrastructure, and a multitude of industries which impact the environment through their projects or their operation. This law, in effect since the Carter administration, has been a mainstay for decades. Now, the Trump administration is working to streamline and make changes that would circumscribe federal powers and perhaps provide a clearer path to some upcoming energy projects.
What changes to NEPA can we expect?
One of the most significant changes to NEPA is that a new category of “non-major” products would escape review. This would narrow the standard by which projects are judged and could lead to many more being approved quickly. The current standard of review takes into account how a project impacts global climate change by looking at the “cumulative” effect of the project, thus a project could be measured against eventual or overall sea level rise or carbon dioxide emissions. However, the Trump administration’s change in category would substantially narrow that review to what are seen as “foreseeable” situations.
For example, a new coal power plant in West Virginia would not be judged by how much carbon dioxide it adds to the world’s air supply and its overall contribution to climate change. It would be judged on how it would affect air quality in its state and possibly surrounding areas over time in addition to any other local environmental impacts. Another project might be judged by how it impacts the local streams and tributaries instead of how it contributes to sea level rise and coral bleaching throughout the world.
Are there any other relevant changes to NEPA that impact the law?
Currently, given the judicial challenges to some projects, environmental impact statements can take more than five years to produce. Given how that can delay a project, its impacts, and any potential job prospects for those dependent on it, the administration is proposing establishing a two year limit on environmental impact statements. They would also establish a one year limit for the more narrowly tailored environmental assessments. The administration also wishes to clarify definitions of some terms so they are technically feasible and so that not all projects or those with minimal federal involvement are not swept into the “major federal action” category.
What do these potential changes to NEPA mean for the energy industry overall?
These changes, while still not law, represent a significant step forward for potential use of energy sources. By lessening the bureaucratic red tape and clarifying the federal government’s role in these projects, those who wish to utilize energy sources more effectively can look toward a greater ease in their environmental assessment or environmental impact statement. Although some of these proposals look promising, it will be up to all leaders in the federal government to work together to pass and implement them in a timely manner.
The 2020 elections are upon us and this year, our country will make important decisions regarding our future. One of the biggest questions supporters of energy deregulation had was: would there be an amendment on the Florida ballot that allowed for voters to approve energy choice?
The drama has resolved itself in the hallowed halls of the Florida Supreme Court, recently ruling that an amendment regarding energy deregulation would not appear on Florida’s 2020 ballot due to its “misleading” wording. For this year’s proposed ballot amendment, it was a death knell that sets back the energy choice amendment process until 2021.
What were the arguments for and against the energy choice amendment in Florida?
Both sides held fast to their positions regarding a possible energy choice amendment for Florida. Had it not been struck from the ballot, the proposal, like other constitutional amendments, would have required 60% approval from Florida voters in order to pass.
On the pro side, Citizens for Energy Choice argued that energy choice was helpful to the state of Florida and would benefit energy consumers throughout the state. Using the examples of Texas and Georgia energy markets, those advocating for energy choice made the case that free market solutions helped energy companies move toward focusing on energy production and not energy purchasing or billing. This injection of competition into the market, according to advocates, would have not only made energy consumption more efficient but more cost effective also by saving Florida consumers $5 billion a year.
On the anti side, many Florida government officials, unions, and others lined up against the amendment. In Florida’s state government, Attorney General Ashley Moody, House of Representatives Speaker Jose Oliva, and Senate President Bill Galvano all lined up in opposition in addition to Floridians for Affordable Reliable Energy and the Florida AFL-CIO. Their reasoning included the amendment eliminating a reliable and affordable energy scheme that had benefitted Floridians for generations. Florida’s government leaders stated that although the amendment purported to provide energy choice, it might in fact do the opposite. The AFL-CIO was particularly concerned about the fact that there was a potential for thousands of union workers who are employed in the power industry to lose their jobs.
What was the Florida Supreme Court’s reasoning in striking down the energy choice amendment in 2020?
The Florida Supreme Court took a dim view of the energy choice amendment as it related to its impact on Florida and on energy consumers. The court, in its opinion, called the amendment’s ballot summary misleading to voters, which would cause them to believe they might have a right to sell electricity. While the court did concede that the amendment allowed consumers to purchase electricity from a provider a person chooses or an energy wholesaler of electricity, in addition to the right to generate their own electricity, they remained focused on the issue of selling electricity which they state the ballot summary claimed but the amendment did not back up.
Florida business groups, such as the Florida Chamber of Commerce and Associated Industries of Florida supported the decision. Adding their voice to the chorus, the Urban League and League of Cities took a similar tack citing a potentially damaging impact to local governments to the tune of more than $1 billion.
What’s next for electricity choice in Florida?
Proponents of energy choice have their project left off the ballot in 2020, but nothing is stopping them from regrouping for the 2022 election and fixing the issue cited by the Florida Supreme Court.
There are many who question how we can better save electricity through renewable methods, decreased consumption, or any other strategy to keep costs down. However, who the top energy-draining culprit is among the United States is often up for debate, as there is a size vs. energy efficiency debate. We’ve compiled a list of the U.S. states and cities that use the most electricity.
Among states, a surprising leader in energy consumption per 2017 U.S. Energy Information Administration gives way to more usual suspects. Notably, the highest total energy consumption does not necessarily equal the highest energy bill per capita.
- Louisiana (960 million Btu per capita; $6,860 per capita annually)
- Wyoming (885 million Btu per capita; $7,672 per capita annually)
- North Dakota (836 million Btu per capita; $7,087 per capita annually)
- Alaska (822 million Btu per capita; $6,911 per capita annually)
- Iowa (496 million Btu per capita; $4,418 per capita annually)
- Texas (472 million Btu per capita; $4,540 per capita annually)
- Nebraska (457 million Btu per capita; $4,299 per capita annually)
- South Dakota (441 million Btu per capita; $4,393 per capita annually)
- Oklahoma (418 million Btu per capita; $3,969 per capita annually)
- West Virginia (416 million Btu per capita; $4,111 per capita annually)
- Indiana (406 million Btu per capita; $4,069 per capita annually)
- Montana (399 million Btu per capita; $4,347 per capita annually)
- Mississippi (394 million Btu per capita; $4,396 per capita annually)
- Alabama (390 million Btu per capita; $4,192 per capita annually)
- Kentucky (372 million Btu per capita; $3,893 per capita annually)
- Kansas (369 million Btu per capita; $3,841 per capita annually)
- Arkansas (352 million Btu per capita; $3,765 per capita annually)
- Minnesota (329 million Btu per capita; $3,604 per capita annually)
- South Carolina (327 million Btu per capita; $3,776 per capita annually)
- New Mexico (327 million Btu per capita; $3,520 per capita annually)
For many of these states, geographical size does not necessarily indicate the amount of energy consumption. The largest exception to the rule is the state of Texas, which is the largest energy consumer overall but still falls short on the per capita measurement. For many states, such as Louisiana, residential and commercial energy consumption is dwarfed by industrial consumption which clocks in at almost 70% of energy consumption in the state. Similarly, the rest of the top five top energy consuming states have high energy consumption due to a robust industrial sector. Industry often refers to manufacturing but in the case of some of these states, can also refer to energy production facilities which may not directly put energy back into the local power grid, such as an oil refinery.
Cities provide an even more interesting window into energy where warmer climates dominate. In 2019, the following cities were the top energy users in the United States.
- Phoenix, Arizona
- San Antonio, Texas
- Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas
- Tampa, Florida
- Austin, Texas
- Palm Bay-Melbourne, Florida
- Houston, Texas
- Miami, Florida
- Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Columbus, Ohio
- Kansas City, Kansas
- Atlanta, Georgia
- Orlando, Florida
Whether the culprit is a climate which requires a more active air conditioning system or a lack of energy efficient appliances or education, there seems to be an overall trend in energy use based on the location of the city. No matter where you stand on energy use, energy efficiency, or alternative energy, you can see that this data demonstrates that size does not always determine amount of use.